rubric_generation_log: 438
This data as json
| id | skill_code | dimension | agent_role | agent_output | version | status | created_at |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 438 | L-FIGURATIVE | performance | pipeline | {"generated_at":"2026-05-25T14:00:00Z","pipeline_version":"2.0","ela_teacher_model":"claude-opus-4-6","researcher_sources":["PARCC ELA/Literacy rubrics for language use and figurative interpretation in literary analysis","NCTE Position Paper on the Role of English Teachers in Educating Students about Figurative Language and Literary Interpretation","NJSLS Language standards L.9-10.5 progression documentation and CCSS alignment for figurative language and word relationships","Florida B.E.S.T. expository writing rubric (7-10)","AP Lit scoring guidelines for sophistication in figurative language analysis","Lumos Learning L.9-10.5 practice items and scoring rationale"],"calibration_method":"research-informed rewrite — all levels analyze same poem line ('the city gnawed at its own bones'), content identification held constant, only depth and specificity of figurative language interpretation vary across performance levels","pedagogy_consultant_flags":[],"status":"validated"} | 1 | draft | 2026-05-26 01:43:59 |